A idéia genial de um Deputado de Vermont-USA:
Quem não quiser ter armas, tem que se registrar como tal e pagar uma taxa de 500 dólares para o estado, para ter o privilégio de não possuir armas, uma vez que a constituição estadual permite que se tenha armas para se defender pessoalmente ou ao Estado. É um dos poucos estados em que ninguém precisa de “Porte de Armas” para sair com sua arma, e obviamente um dos mais bem armados e com um dos menores índices de criminalidade. O deputado argumenta que o estado tem interesse em conhecer quem não quer estar preparado para se defender ou defender o estado, e que não é justo para os que tem armas (paga-se o registro, cerca de 30 dólares), pagar taxas que revertem para a polícia, que vai proteger os desarmados. Eles deveriam pagar sua própria taxa de proteção.
*******************************************
( texto original)
Amen! Let's hear it for Vermont!!
Vermont State Rep. Fred Maslack has read the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, as well as Vermont 's own Constitution very carefully, and his strict interpretation of these documents is popping some eyeballs in New England and elsewhere.
Maslack recently proposed a bill to register "non-gun-owners" and require them to pay a $500 fee to the state. Thus Vermont would become the first state to require a permit for the luxury of going about unarmed and assess a fee of $500 for the privilege of not owning a gun
Maslack read the "militia" phrase of the Second Amendment as not only affirming the right of the individual citizen to bear arms, but as a clear mandate to do so. He believes that universal gun ownership was advocated by the Framers of the Constitution as an antidote to a "monopoly of force" by the government as well as criminals
Vermont 's constitution states explicitly that "the people have a right to bear arms for the defense of themselves and the State" and those persons who are "conscientiously scrupulous of bearing arms" shall be required to "pay such equivalent." Clearly, says Maslack, Vermonters have a constitutional obligation to arm themselves, so that they are capable of responding to "any situation that may arise."
Under the bill, adults who choose not to own a firearm would be required to register their name, address, Social Security Number, and driver's license number with the state. "There is a legitimate government interest in knowing who is not prepared to defend the state should they be asked to do so," Maslack says
Vermont already boasts a high rate of gun ownership along with the least restrictive laws of any state ... it's currently the only state that allows a citizen to carry a concealed firearm without a permit. This combination of plenty of guns and few laws regulating them has resulted in a crime rate that is the third lowest in the nation
" America is at that awkward stage. It's too late to work within the system, but too early to shoot the bastards."
This makes sense! There is no reason why gun owners should have to pay taxes to support police protection for people not wanting to own guns. Let them contribute their fair share and pay their own way.
Espaço destinado a divulgar todo tipo de notícias, informações e imagens relacionadas a Armas de Fogo, novidades para Colecionadores, Atiradores e Caçadores registrados no Exército Brasileiro. Informações sobre Tiro Esportivo, Tiro Prático, Tiro Defensivo e Caça Regulamentada, bem como informações relacionadas a Segurança Pessoal e Patrimonial.
Nenhum comentário:
Postar um comentário